<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 242 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100698</link>
    <description>The court held that the suit, initially transferred to the High Court during winding-up proceedings, would not be retransferred to the Alipore Court despite the winding-up proceedings being permanently stayed. Emphasizing the potential for delays, additional costs, and procedural complexities, the court maintained jurisdiction over the suit against defendant No. 1, ultimately deciding against retransfer and awarding costs in the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 242 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100698</link>
      <description>The court held that the suit, initially transferred to the High Court during winding-up proceedings, would not be retransferred to the Alipore Court despite the winding-up proceedings being permanently stayed. Emphasizing the potential for delays, additional costs, and procedural complexities, the court maintained jurisdiction over the suit against defendant No. 1, ultimately deciding against retransfer and awarding costs in the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>