<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 485 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100697</link>
    <description>Attempted clandestine export to Bangladesh was not proved with sufficient certainty, and the finding of only an apparent attempt indicated suspicion rather than established proof. On the available facts, the evidence was held inadequate to support the adverse order against the appellant, so the personal penalty was set aside and release of the claimed goods was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 485 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100697</link>
      <description>Attempted clandestine export to Bangladesh was not proved with sufficient certainty, and the finding of only an apparent attempt indicated suspicion rather than established proof. On the available facts, the evidence was held inadequate to support the adverse order against the appellant, so the personal penalty was set aside and release of the claimed goods was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>