<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 481 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100686</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the appellant&#039;s explanation of domestic difficulty and an accident was unsupported by evidence. The exact date of the accident was not shown, no medical records were produced, and the explanation did not satisfactorily account for the period beyond the normal filing time. The miscellaneous application was rejected, and the appeal stood dismissed as a consequence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 481 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100686</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the appellant&#039;s explanation of domestic difficulty and an accident was unsupported by evidence. The exact date of the accident was not shown, no medical records were produced, and the explanation did not satisfactorily account for the period beyond the normal filing time. The miscellaneous application was rejected, and the appeal stood dismissed as a consequence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>