https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100685 The court upheld the order directing the advertisement of the winding-up petition, dismissing the appeal. It found that the workmen had the right to be heard, and the defect in the original proceedings was cured through the full appellate hearing. The court emphasized the appellate jurisdiction's co-extensiveness with the original jurisdiction and noted that no winding-up order had been issued yet, allowing the workmen to present their case before the company court. The court denied the appellant's request for a certificate of fitness to appeal to the Supreme Court, citing the absence of substantial legal questions of general importance. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:40:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100685 The court upheld the order directing the advertisement of the winding-up petition, dismissing the appeal. It found that the workmen had the right to be heard, and the defect in the original proceedings was cured through the full appellate hearing. The court emphasized the appellate jurisdiction's co-extensiveness with the original jurisdiction and noted that no winding-up order had been issued yet, allowing the workmen to present their case before the company court. The court denied the appellant's request for a certificate of fitness to appeal to the Supreme Court, citing the absence of substantial legal questions of general importance. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 23 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100685