<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 476 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100679</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the steamer agent, setting aside the personal penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed on them for unmanifested cargo. The tribunal found no evidence of the agent&#039;s involvement in the importation of the cargo. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 476 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100679</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the steamer agent, setting aside the personal penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed on them for unmanifested cargo. The tribunal found no evidence of the agent&#039;s involvement in the importation of the cargo. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>