<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 212 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100659</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between two companies, finding it just, fair, and reasonable. The court directed the transferee company to apply for approval of the name change under Section 21 of the Companies Act. The costs of the advocate for the Regional Director were to be borne by the transferee company. The scheme would become effective upon obtaining the necessary approval for the name change.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 212 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100659</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between two companies, finding it just, fair, and reasonable. The court directed the transferee company to apply for approval of the name change under Section 21 of the Companies Act. The costs of the advocate for the Regional Director were to be borne by the transferee company. The scheme would become effective upon obtaining the necessary approval for the name change.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>