<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 696 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100656</link>
    <description>An application to restore an appeal dismissed for default was rejected because the claimed cause for non-appearance was not substantiated. The party alleged that a telegram had been sent seeking adjournment and that the Chartered Accountant was ill, but the record contained no acceptable proof of the telegram and no evidence supporting the illness plea. In the absence of credible material showing sufficient cause, restoration was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 696 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100656</link>
      <description>An application to restore an appeal dismissed for default was rejected because the claimed cause for non-appearance was not substantiated. The party alleged that a telegram had been sent seeking adjournment and that the Chartered Accountant was ill, but the record contained no acceptable proof of the telegram and no evidence supporting the illness plea. In the absence of credible material showing sufficient cause, restoration was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>