<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 848 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100623</link>
    <description>Glued insulated rail joints were treated as classifiable under sub-heading 8530.00 on the basis of an earlier Tribunal decision on the same product, and the existing classification was upheld. The Modvat credit question was remitted to the adjudicating authority for limited re-examination, with the instruction that admissible credit be worked out if the assessee was otherwise eligible. The redemption fine and personal penalty were found excessive and were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 848 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100623</link>
      <description>Glued insulated rail joints were treated as classifiable under sub-heading 8530.00 on the basis of an earlier Tribunal decision on the same product, and the existing classification was upheld. The Modvat credit question was remitted to the adjudicating authority for limited re-examination, with the instruction that admissible credit be worked out if the assessee was otherwise eligible. The redemption fine and personal penalty were found excessive and were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>