<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 845 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100620</link>
    <description>Pro rata abatement of octroi, turnover tax and secondary freight may be examined for valuation where a multi-product business cannot precisely allocate common expenses to sun glasses. Average or equalised allocation based on turnover may be relevant, and a deduction claim should not fail solely because product-wise figures are unavailable. The applicable duty rate under the relevant tariff classification also requires verification as part of the valuation and duty determination. Both the deduction claim and tariff-rate issue require fresh consideration on the evidence and applicable tariff position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:35:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 845 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100620</link>
      <description>Pro rata abatement of octroi, turnover tax and secondary freight may be examined for valuation where a multi-product business cannot precisely allocate common expenses to sun glasses. Average or equalised allocation based on turnover may be relevant, and a deduction claim should not fail solely because product-wise figures are unavailable. The applicable duty rate under the relevant tariff classification also requires verification as part of the valuation and duty determination. Both the deduction claim and tariff-rate issue require fresh consideration on the evidence and applicable tariff position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>