<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 835 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100610</link>
    <description>In a recurring customs valuation dispute involving continuing imports, pre-deposit of penalties was waived and recovery stayed pending final adjudication because duty had already been secured through payment or bank guarantees and immediate recovery would create unnecessary financial burden. Early hearing was also allowed since further consignments were expected under the same contracts, making the controversy repetitive and involving continuing exposure. The applications were thus substantially allowed, while no separate direction was issued on future clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 835 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100610</link>
      <description>In a recurring customs valuation dispute involving continuing imports, pre-deposit of penalties was waived and recovery stayed pending final adjudication because duty had already been secured through payment or bank guarantees and immediate recovery would create unnecessary financial burden. Early hearing was also allowed since further consignments were expected under the same contracts, making the controversy repetitive and involving continuing exposure. The applications were thus substantially allowed, while no separate direction was issued on future clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>