<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 830 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100605</link>
    <description>Excess Modvat credit reversed by the assessee in the same month, before issuance of the show cause notice, was treated as a curative step that removed the basis for penalty. Applying its earlier decisions, CEGAT held that where the default is corrected before notice, penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules is not justified on the same lapse. On those facts, the penalty was held not imposable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:46:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 830 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100605</link>
      <description>Excess Modvat credit reversed by the assessee in the same month, before issuance of the show cause notice, was treated as a curative step that removed the basis for penalty. Applying its earlier decisions, CEGAT held that where the default is corrected before notice, penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules is not justified on the same lapse. On those facts, the penalty was held not imposable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>