<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 638 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100589</link>
    <description>A revocation order cannot survive where the underlying licence had already expired before the show cause notice was issued, because proceedings directed at an expired licence become infructuous in law. On that basis, the revocation order was treated as unsustainable and the appeal was disposed of in the appellants&#039; favour to that extent. The pending proceedings arising from the later notice and the renewal application were treated as separate matters and were left unaffected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:54:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 638 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100589</link>
      <description>A revocation order cannot survive where the underlying licence had already expired before the show cause notice was issued, because proceedings directed at an expired licence become infructuous in law. On that basis, the revocation order was treated as unsustainable and the appeal was disposed of in the appellants&#039; favour to that extent. The pending proceedings arising from the later notice and the renewal application were treated as separate matters and were left unaffected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>