<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 660 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration, setting aside the impugned order, to assess the entitlement to the benefit of SSI Notification based on the use of a foreign unit&#039;s logo. The Tribunal also directed the original adjudicating authority to consider the time-barring aspect during de novo proceedings and emphasized the need for a thorough analysis of the impact of using the foreign company&#039;s logo on eligibility for SSI exemption based on relevant legal precedents and Notification provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 660 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration, setting aside the impugned order, to assess the entitlement to the benefit of SSI Notification based on the use of a foreign unit&#039;s logo. The Tribunal also directed the original adjudicating authority to consider the time-barring aspect during de novo proceedings and emphasized the need for a thorough analysis of the impact of using the foreign company&#039;s logo on eligibility for SSI exemption based on relevant legal precedents and Notification provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>