<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 383 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100577</link>
    <description>Deductions from the wholesale price for instruction manuals, soft cases, freight, insurance and excise duty were treated as allowable in the valuation of photographic cameras because the Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case. The remand order directing fresh working out of the deductions was held unsustainable and was set aside, with relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:33:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 383 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100577</link>
      <description>Deductions from the wholesale price for instruction manuals, soft cases, freight, insurance and excise duty were treated as allowable in the valuation of photographic cameras because the Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case. The remand order directing fresh working out of the deductions was held unsustainable and was set aside, with relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>