<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (8) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100560</link>
    <description>Section 9(1) and section 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act required inter-State sales tax to be levied and collected in the same manner as tax under the general sales tax law of the appropriate State. Applying that construction, the Court held that the State sales tax law and relevant rules governed the assessment machinery, so rule 7 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950, which allowed deduction of excise duty, remained available to the assessee. The absence of a corresponding deduction in rule 11(2) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 did not override section 9. The assessee was therefore entitled to the claimed deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (8) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100560</link>
      <description>Section 9(1) and section 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act required inter-State sales tax to be levied and collected in the same manner as tax under the general sales tax law of the appropriate State. Applying that construction, the Court held that the State sales tax law and relevant rules governed the assessment machinery, so rule 7 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950, which allowed deduction of excise duty, remained available to the assessee. The absence of a corresponding deduction in rule 11(2) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 did not override section 9. The assessee was therefore entitled to the claimed deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>