<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 192 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100532</link>
    <description>Imported goods were treated on a prima facie basis as zip tape, an independent product distinct from zipper chain formed by adding scoops or teeth, so the exemption under Notification No. 190/90-Cus was not available at that stage. The Tribunal also noted that final consideration was required on tariff classification under Heading 58.06. On that reasoning, it granted stay of operation of the lower appellate order allowing exemption until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 192 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100532</link>
      <description>Imported goods were treated on a prima facie basis as zip tape, an independent product distinct from zipper chain formed by adding scoops or teeth, so the exemption under Notification No. 190/90-Cus was not available at that stage. The Tribunal also noted that final consideration was required on tariff classification under Heading 58.06. On that reasoning, it granted stay of operation of the lower appellate order allowing exemption until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>