https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100529 The Tribunal concluded that the goods imported by the appellants were not covered by the licence produced. However, the confiscation of the goods was deemed unjustified due to past clearances of similar goods by the Customs Department and the absence of a public notice indicating a change in policy. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the confiscation was overturned, and the appellants were granted consequential reliefs. en-us Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:02:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100529 The Tribunal concluded that the goods imported by the appellants were not covered by the licence produced. However, the confiscation of the goods was deemed unjustified due to past clearances of similar goods by the Customs Department and the absence of a public notice indicating a change in policy. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the confiscation was overturned, and the appellants were granted consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100529