<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (4) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100523</link>
    <description>Power under section 17 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act extended beyond declared registration premises to any place that in fact functioned as the dealer&#039;s place of business, including a secret gaddi used to keep account books, so search and seizure there were valid. Procedural safeguards under section 165(4) read with section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 did not apply because the officer acted under special delegated powers of inspection, search and seizure under the sales tax law, not as a police investigator of a cognizable offence. The offences were treated as technical, and imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (4) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100523</link>
      <description>Power under section 17 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act extended beyond declared registration premises to any place that in fact functioned as the dealer&#039;s place of business, including a secret gaddi used to keep account books, so search and seizure there were valid. Procedural safeguards under section 165(4) read with section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 did not apply because the officer acted under special delegated powers of inspection, search and seizure under the sales tax law, not as a police investigator of a cognizable offence. The offences were treated as technical, and imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>