<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 733 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100496</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the petitioners&#039; accrued rights could not be denied due to a subsequent policy discontinuation or application timing. The Court found that the rejection of the application based on time limitations was erroneous, emphasizing that once a right accrued under an existing policy, it could not be nullified by policy withdrawal. The Court disagreed with the appellate authority&#039;s reasoning and set aside the judgment, directing the payment of the premium amount owed to the petitioners by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 733 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100496</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the petitioners&#039; accrued rights could not be denied due to a subsequent policy discontinuation or application timing. The Court found that the rejection of the application based on time limitations was erroneous, emphasizing that once a right accrued under an existing policy, it could not be nullified by policy withdrawal. The Court disagreed with the appellate authority&#039;s reasoning and set aside the judgment, directing the payment of the premium amount owed to the petitioners by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>