https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100495 Foreign currency seized from persons facing proceedings under FERA could not be ordered returned in writ proceedings while adjudication remained pending, because the petitioner's claim of ownership and explanation for possession required examination by the adjudicating authority. On the materials before the HC, the seizure and continued retention were not liable to be set aside, and no direction for return of the currency could be issued. The challenge therefore failed. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100495 Foreign currency seized from persons facing proceedings under FERA could not be ordered returned in writ proceedings while adjudication remained pending, because the petitioner's claim of ownership and explanation for possession required examination by the adjudicating authority. On the materials before the HC, the seizure and continued retention were not liable to be set aside, and no direction for return of the currency could be issued. The challenge therefore failed. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 16 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100495