https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100492 Appeal maintainability against a Commissioner (Appeals)' interim pre-deposit order under section 35F was not finally determined because conflicting views and the relevance of Jain Engineering Company warranted reference to a Larger Bench. Recovery of the penalty was stayed meanwhile, as immediate enforcement pending that reference was likely to cause prejudice and undue hardship, and the Tribunal exercised its procedural power to preserve the parties' position until the Larger Bench decided the issue. en-us Tue, 06 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:38:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100492 Appeal maintainability against a Commissioner (Appeals)' interim pre-deposit order under section 35F was not finally determined because conflicting views and the relevance of Jain Engineering Company warranted reference to a Larger Bench. Recovery of the penalty was stayed meanwhile, as immediate enforcement pending that reference was likely to cause prejudice and undue hardship, and the Tribunal exercised its procedural power to preserve the parties' position until the Larger Bench decided the issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100492