https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100488 Rectification was declined because no mistake apparent on the face of the record was shown in the Tribunal's final order. A mere difference of opinion, or the argument that the order misread the departmental case or went beyond the show cause notice, was held insufficient for rectification. The cited precedent was distinguished on its facts, and no patent error, self-evident mistake, or clear infirmity in the earlier order was established. Rectification was therefore not warranted. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:30:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100488 Rectification was declined because no mistake apparent on the face of the record was shown in the Tribunal's final order. A mere difference of opinion, or the argument that the order misread the departmental case or went beyond the show cause notice, was held insufficient for rectification. The cited precedent was distinguished on its facts, and no patent error, self-evident mistake, or clear infirmity in the earlier order was established. Rectification was therefore not warranted. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100488