<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 336 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100487</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi dismissed the ROM application, stating that the complaint about the redemption fine not being fixed properly had already been considered and dismissed in the Final Order. The applicant&#039;s remedy lies in challenging the Final Order through an appeal, not through a ROM application. The ROM application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:29:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 336 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100487</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi dismissed the ROM application, stating that the complaint about the redemption fine not being fixed properly had already been considered and dismissed in the Final Order. The applicant&#039;s remedy lies in challenging the Final Order through an appeal, not through a ROM application. The ROM application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>