https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100484 A Force Majeure clause could not be relied on beyond its contractual scope, as the clause was expressly confined to the petitioner's own factory premises. The petitioner also advanced shifting factual bases, including communal riots, cargo backlog, and a fire in the supplier's premises, which undermined the plea for writ relief. A fire at the supplier's premises did not attract the clause, and the supporting letter and cited Supreme Court authority did not assist on the facts. The challenge to encashment of the bank guarantee therefore failed, and no restraint or interference was warranted. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:25:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100484 A Force Majeure clause could not be relied on beyond its contractual scope, as the clause was expressly confined to the petitioner's own factory premises. The petitioner also advanced shifting factual bases, including communal riots, cargo backlog, and a fire in the supplier's premises, which undermined the plea for writ relief. A fire at the supplier's premises did not attract the clause, and the supporting letter and cited Supreme Court authority did not assist on the facts. The challenge to encashment of the bank guarantee therefore failed, and no restraint or interference was warranted. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100484