<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 414 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, remanding the matter to the original authority for new proceedings. The original authority must adhere to natural justice principles, conduct proper proceedings, and issue a detailed order on the appellants&#039; request for de-bonding and destruction of imported and indigenous items. Appeal No. C/278/00 was allowed for remand, while Appeal No. 279/01, stay application, and COD were deemed not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 414 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, remanding the matter to the original authority for new proceedings. The original authority must adhere to natural justice principles, conduct proper proceedings, and issue a detailed order on the appellants&#039; request for de-bonding and destruction of imported and indigenous items. Appeal No. C/278/00 was allowed for remand, while Appeal No. 279/01, stay application, and COD were deemed not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>