<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 408 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100452</link>
    <description>A rectification request failed because no error apparent on the face of the record was shown in the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order. The applicant sought total exemption from anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 127/93 on the basis that imports under an advance licence were wholly exempt, but the Tribunal noted that the three imports in question had occurred before the notification came into force. That timing prevented reliance on the notification for complete exemption, and the earlier refund direction did not disclose any apparent mistake. The request for rectification was therefore not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:44:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 408 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100452</link>
      <description>A rectification request failed because no error apparent on the face of the record was shown in the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order. The applicant sought total exemption from anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 127/93 on the basis that imports under an advance licence were wholly exempt, but the Tribunal noted that the three imports in question had occurred before the notification came into force. That timing prevented reliance on the notification for complete exemption, and the earlier refund direction did not disclose any apparent mistake. The request for rectification was therefore not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>