<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 405 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification of alleged mistakes in the Final Order, specifically regarding the awarding of costs to the Revenue. The Tribunal held that the application did not meet the criteria for rectification under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:40:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 405 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification of alleged mistakes in the Final Order, specifically regarding the awarding of costs to the Revenue. The Tribunal held that the application did not meet the criteria for rectification under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>