https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100437 Dismissal for non-compliance with a stay order was recalled where part of the directed amount had already been deposited and counsel's inability to properly inform the result of High Court proceedings contributed to the earlier dismissal. The Tribunal restored the appeals to their original numbers and made restoration conditional on deposit of the balance duty and penalty within 15 days. The ruling shows that earlier dismissal orders may be set aside in appropriate circumstances, but compliance with the remaining monetary obligation can still be required as a condition for continuation of the appeal. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:21:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100437 Dismissal for non-compliance with a stay order was recalled where part of the directed amount had already been deposited and counsel's inability to properly inform the result of High Court proceedings contributed to the earlier dismissal. The Tribunal restored the appeals to their original numbers and made restoration conditional on deposit of the balance duty and penalty within 15 days. The ruling shows that earlier dismissal orders may be set aside in appropriate circumstances, but compliance with the remaining monetary obligation can still be required as a condition for continuation of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100437