<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 605 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner for further examination in light of the arguments presented by the appellant. The Commissioner was directed to verify the facts regarding the tanks&#039; permanency, movability, and dutiability, providing an opportunity for the appellant to present evidence. The case was to be expedited for a just resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:05:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 605 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner for further examination in light of the arguments presented by the appellant. The Commissioner was directed to verify the facts regarding the tanks&#039; permanency, movability, and dutiability, providing an opportunity for the appellant to present evidence. The case was to be expedited for a just resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>