<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 601 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100412</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on Indwool Ceramic Fibre Blanket because it was used as furnace lining and functioned to prevent heat escape, thereby supporting efficient manufacturing. The material&#039;s location and role showed it was integrally connected with the furnace and formed part or accessory of capital goods for credit purposes. Earlier Tribunal decisions on similar goods were followed. Credit was therefore upheld and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:54:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 601 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100412</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on Indwool Ceramic Fibre Blanket because it was used as furnace lining and functioned to prevent heat escape, thereby supporting efficient manufacturing. The material&#039;s location and role showed it was integrally connected with the furnace and formed part or accessory of capital goods for credit purposes. Earlier Tribunal decisions on similar goods were followed. Credit was therefore upheld and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>