https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100397 The Tribunal's power to hear and dispose of an appeal together with the stay request was upheld, as no legal bar prevented it from taking up the matter when appropriate, especially where the dispute was already covered by an earlier Tribunal decision. A separate stay order was treated as unnecessary once the appeal itself stood disposed of. The proposed question on alleged overreach of Section 35A was found irrelevant, and the issue concerning doubtful transfer of inputs was treated as a factual question rather than a question of law. No referable question of law arose, so the request for reference was rejected. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:15:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100397 The Tribunal's power to hear and dispose of an appeal together with the stay request was upheld, as no legal bar prevented it from taking up the matter when appropriate, especially where the dispute was already covered by an earlier Tribunal decision. A separate stay order was treated as unnecessary once the appeal itself stood disposed of. The proposed question on alleged overreach of Section 35A was found irrelevant, and the issue concerning doubtful transfer of inputs was treated as a factual question rather than a question of law. No referable question of law arose, so the request for reference was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100397