<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (4) TMI 124 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100392</link>
    <description>Repeated sales of surplus war material through an organised disposal system, supported by advertisements, auctions, continuity and a profit motive, were treated as carrying on business rather than mere realisation of capital assets. Applying the settled test that business involves a course of dealings marked by continuity, frequency, system and commercial purpose, the majority view held that the Government&#039;s Directorate of Disposals was a dealer under section 2(c) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Shah J. dissented, considering the activity only a disposal of surplus war equipment and therefore outside the concept of business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (4) TMI 124 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100392</link>
      <description>Repeated sales of surplus war material through an organised disposal system, supported by advertisements, auctions, continuity and a profit motive, were treated as carrying on business rather than mere realisation of capital assets. Applying the settled test that business involves a course of dealings marked by continuity, frequency, system and commercial purpose, the majority view held that the Government&#039;s Directorate of Disposals was a dealer under section 2(c) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Shah J. dissented, considering the activity only a disposal of surplus war equipment and therefore outside the concept of business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>