<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 744 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving delayed delivery of goods, seizure of goods due to invalid gate passes, and a claim for refund of duty paid twice. The Tribunal determined that the duty passed on to the buyer should be half of the total duty paid by the manufacturer and likely occurred during the initial clearance of goods from the factory. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:01:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 744 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving delayed delivery of goods, seizure of goods due to invalid gate passes, and a claim for refund of duty paid twice. The Tribunal determined that the duty passed on to the buyer should be half of the total duty paid by the manufacturer and likely occurred during the initial clearance of goods from the factory. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>