<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 737 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100365</link>
    <description>The note examines whether transfer and additional tools imported with an automatic flow forming machine were classifiable as interchangeable tools under heading 82.07 or as parts of the machine under heading 8462.99, and whether exemption under Notification No. 40/78-Cus. applied. It states that, on one view, the tools were specially imported for the particular machine, were not shown to be independently usable or interchangeable with other machines, and were therefore integral parts classifiable under heading 8462.99, preserving the exemption. The note also records a concurring opinion taking the opposite view on interchangeability, limitation, and exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:44:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 737 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100365</link>
      <description>The note examines whether transfer and additional tools imported with an automatic flow forming machine were classifiable as interchangeable tools under heading 82.07 or as parts of the machine under heading 8462.99, and whether exemption under Notification No. 40/78-Cus. applied. It states that, on one view, the tools were specially imported for the particular machine, were not shown to be independently usable or interchangeable with other machines, and were therefore integral parts classifiable under heading 8462.99, preserving the exemption. The note also records a concurring opinion taking the opposite view on interchangeability, limitation, and exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>