<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 792 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100358</link>
    <description>Duty-paid goods returned by customers may be re-cleared without payment of duty under Rule 173H where the returned goods are received back and D-3 intimations are filed. Absence of prior permission, delayed intimation, or non-compliance with trade notice procedure is a procedural lapse and does not by itself justify denial of the substantive benefit, especially where departmental verification of the returned goods was not undertaken. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to clear the returned goods without duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 792 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100358</link>
      <description>Duty-paid goods returned by customers may be re-cleared without payment of duty under Rule 173H where the returned goods are received back and D-3 intimations are filed. Absence of prior permission, delayed intimation, or non-compliance with trade notice procedure is a procedural lapse and does not by itself justify denial of the substantive benefit, especially where departmental verification of the returned goods was not undertaken. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to clear the returned goods without duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>