<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 190 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100347</link>
    <description>The court found that the respondent-company owed the petitioner Rs. 34,412.25 for services rendered, with the respondent&#039;s dispute deemed as not genuine but intended to harass. As a result, the court ordered the winding up of the respondent-company, appointing an official liquidator to oversee the process. The petition was granted with costs, and the order was to be published in specified newspapers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:54:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 190 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100347</link>
      <description>The court found that the respondent-company owed the petitioner Rs. 34,412.25 for services rendered, with the respondent&#039;s dispute deemed as not genuine but intended to harass. As a result, the court ordered the winding up of the respondent-company, appointing an official liquidator to oversee the process. The petition was granted with costs, and the order was to be published in specified newspapers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>