<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 802 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100339</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove receipt of inputs in their factory. The demand of Rs. 46,922 was confirmed based solely on invoices. The Commissioner (Appeals) affirmed this decision, noting the lack of evidence regarding the origin of the inputs supplied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 802 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100339</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove receipt of inputs in their factory. The demand of Rs. 46,922 was confirmed based solely on invoices. The Commissioner (Appeals) affirmed this decision, noting the lack of evidence regarding the origin of the inputs supplied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>