https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100324 The court found that the allegations of misappropriation and misapplication of company funds were not solely attributed to the current controlling group but involved both groups. The complaints regarding the fictitious entry of payment to Dr. Paul, removal of the company secretary, misappropriation of cement by the chairman, cancellation of an appointment, and refusal to circulate no-confidence motions were dismissed. The court directed an amendment to the company's articles of association to rectify a drafting mistake regarding the allowance of a poll at general meetings. en-us Mon, 24 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:49:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100324 The court found that the allegations of misappropriation and misapplication of company funds were not solely attributed to the current controlling group but involved both groups. The complaints regarding the fictitious entry of payment to Dr. Paul, removal of the company secretary, misappropriation of cement by the chairman, cancellation of an appointment, and refusal to circulate no-confidence motions were dismissed. The court directed an amendment to the company's articles of association to rectify a drafting mistake regarding the allowance of a poll at general meetings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100324