https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100322 An erstwhile managing director was treated as having locus to seek recall of a winding-up order because the challenge was directed at the order that had displaced him and the company otherwise lacked effective representation. Limitation was computed from the date of knowledge where no effective notice of the order was received; on the stated facts, the application was filed promptly and any delay was condonable. The ex parte winding-up order was vulnerable because the company had not had a real opportunity to be heard, so breach of natural justice justified exercise of review and inherent powers to revoke the order and restore the company to its status. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:45:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100322 An erstwhile managing director was treated as having locus to seek recall of a winding-up order because the challenge was directed at the order that had displaced him and the company otherwise lacked effective representation. Limitation was computed from the date of knowledge where no effective notice of the order was received; on the stated facts, the application was filed promptly and any delay was condonable. The ex parte winding-up order was vulnerable because the company had not had a real opportunity to be heard, so breach of natural justice justified exercise of review and inherent powers to revoke the order and restore the company to its status. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 09 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100322