<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100316</link>
    <description>In sales tax classification, goods are construed in their popular and commercial sense, as understood by traders and consumers, unless the statute requires a technical meaning. Applying that test, charcoal was treated as falling within the expression &quot;coal&quot; in the relevant schedule entry, supported by the scheme of the Act and the separate treatment of fuel items, so it was taxed under the specific entry rather than the residuary entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100316</link>
      <description>In sales tax classification, goods are construed in their popular and commercial sense, as understood by traders and consumers, unless the statute requires a technical meaning. Applying that test, charcoal was treated as falling within the expression &quot;coal&quot; in the relevant schedule entry, supported by the scheme of the Act and the separate treatment of fuel items, so it was taxed under the specific entry rather than the residuary entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>