<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100309</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, ruling that sales of sleepers were not taxable by the State of Madhya Pradesh as they fell under the Explanation to Article 286(1)(a). The Court held that actual delivery occurred at the destination upon final acceptance by the consignee, outside Madhya Pradesh, as per the contract terms. This decision aligned with previous interpretations of similar legal provisions and aimed to prevent multiple taxation on the same transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100309</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, ruling that sales of sleepers were not taxable by the State of Madhya Pradesh as they fell under the Explanation to Article 286(1)(a). The Court held that actual delivery occurred at the destination upon final acceptance by the consignee, outside Madhya Pradesh, as per the contract terms. This decision aligned with previous interpretations of similar legal provisions and aimed to prevent multiple taxation on the same transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>