<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 265 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100298</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling that no application lay under section 100(1) of the Companies Act, and the company could file an application under section 155 for rectification in the share register. The judgment emphasized distinguishing between share capital and other financial obligations and the limitations of legal admissions in determining corporate obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:09:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 265 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100298</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling that no application lay under section 100(1) of the Companies Act, and the company could file an application under section 155 for rectification in the share register. The judgment emphasized distinguishing between share capital and other financial obligations and the limitations of legal admissions in determining corporate obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>