<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100290</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, the impugned order of December 20, 1983, was set aside, and the notice of motion was dismissed. The litigation was deemed frivolous and vexatious, warranting an order of compensatory costs. The court emphasized the need to nip such litigation in the bud to maintain confidence in the judicial system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100290</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, the impugned order of December 20, 1983, was set aside, and the notice of motion was dismissed. The litigation was deemed frivolous and vexatious, warranting an order of compensatory costs. The court emphasized the need to nip such litigation in the bud to maintain confidence in the judicial system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>