<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 688 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100273</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification 1/93 remained available to a small scale unit where the factory was not registered with the Directorate General of Technical Development, because the later exemption under Section 29B of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 rendered the earlier registration-based exclusion inapplicable. The assessee&#039;s investment in plant and machinery was within the small scale limit, so the obsolete registration objection could not defeat the notification benefit during the relevant period. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the unit was treated as entitled to the notification relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 688 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100273</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification 1/93 remained available to a small scale unit where the factory was not registered with the Directorate General of Technical Development, because the later exemption under Section 29B of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 rendered the earlier registration-based exclusion inapplicable. The assessee&#039;s investment in plant and machinery was within the small scale limit, so the obsolete registration objection could not defeat the notification benefit during the relevant period. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the unit was treated as entitled to the notification relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>