<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100265</link>
    <description>Wrongful withholding of company property after termination of employment under section 630(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 is complete when the withholding first becomes unlawful and is not a continuing offence under section 472 CrPC. On limitation, a complaint for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to two years attracts a three-year period under section 468(1)(c) CrPC; a filing beyond that period is time-barred. The court may nevertheless extend limitation under section 473 CrPC where the delay is properly explained or where cognizance is necessary in the interests of justice, and no separate application is mandatory. Applying that principle, the complaint was restored for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100265</link>
      <description>Wrongful withholding of company property after termination of employment under section 630(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 is complete when the withholding first becomes unlawful and is not a continuing offence under section 472 CrPC. On limitation, a complaint for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to two years attracts a three-year period under section 468(1)(c) CrPC; a filing beyond that period is time-barred. The court may nevertheless extend limitation under section 473 CrPC where the delay is properly explained or where cognizance is necessary in the interests of justice, and no separate application is mandatory. Applying that principle, the complaint was restored for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>