<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100250</link>
    <description>Hire-purchase transactions were not treated as sales for sales tax purposes until the hirer exercised the option to purchase and property actually passed. The Court held that a hire-purchase arrangement contains both bailment and a contingent sale element, but the taxable event of sale does not arise before completion of the option to purchase. A State Legislature cannot, by a deeming provision, convert a transaction where title has not passed into a sale under the sales law framework. Applying the controlling precedent, the Supreme Court held Explanation (1) to Section 2(j) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1125 beyond legislative competence, so hire-purchase turnover could not be included in taxable turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100250</link>
      <description>Hire-purchase transactions were not treated as sales for sales tax purposes until the hirer exercised the option to purchase and property actually passed. The Court held that a hire-purchase arrangement contains both bailment and a contingent sale element, but the taxable event of sale does not arise before completion of the option to purchase. A State Legislature cannot, by a deeming provision, convert a transaction where title has not passed into a sale under the sales law framework. Applying the controlling precedent, the Supreme Court held Explanation (1) to Section 2(j) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1125 beyond legislative competence, so hire-purchase turnover could not be included in taxable turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>