<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 209 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100240</link>
    <description>Leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to continue or prosecute proceedings against a company in liquidation extends to execution of the resulting decree. Section 537, which addresses attachments, distress and execution relating to antecedent transactions, does not require separate leave where the suit was already permitted under section 446; execution is treated as a continuation of that suit. Administration of liquidation assets is conducted through the liquidator and, where constituted, a committee of inspection. Without such a committee or a proper application to appoint one, an individual creditor has no direct right to intervene in asset-administration matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 209 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100240</link>
      <description>Leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to continue or prosecute proceedings against a company in liquidation extends to execution of the resulting decree. Section 537, which addresses attachments, distress and execution relating to antecedent transactions, does not require separate leave where the suit was already permitted under section 446; execution is treated as a continuation of that suit. Administration of liquidation assets is conducted through the liquidator and, where constituted, a committee of inspection. Without such a committee or a proper application to appoint one, an individual creditor has no direct right to intervene in asset-administration matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>