<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100239</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions, affirming that the transfers of shares were legally effective, and the petitioners could not alter their position after initially acknowledging the capital gains. The judgment underscored the significance of interpreting agreements based on their legal consequences and enforcing tax obligations accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100239</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions, affirming that the transfers of shares were legally effective, and the petitioners could not alter their position after initially acknowledging the capital gains. The judgment underscored the significance of interpreting agreements based on their legal consequences and enforcing tax obligations accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>