<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 217 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100225</link>
    <description>Section 209 statutory entitlement permits a director to inspect company books and papers and to exercise that right through an authorised agent provided the agent gives a confidentiality undertaking; the same principle is applied here. Inspection is allowed of company records for the last eight years in favour of the director and/or his chartered accountant and/or his advocate, subject to an undertaking that information obtained will be disclosed only to the director. Petitioners must provide respondents access to documents relied upon in the company petition, and respondents must file affidavits in reply within the fixed timetable to prevent delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:24:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 217 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100225</link>
      <description>Section 209 statutory entitlement permits a director to inspect company books and papers and to exercise that right through an authorised agent provided the agent gives a confidentiality undertaking; the same principle is applied here. Inspection is allowed of company records for the last eight years in favour of the director and/or his chartered accountant and/or his advocate, subject to an undertaking that information obtained will be disclosed only to the director. Petitioners must provide respondents access to documents relied upon in the company petition, and respondents must file affidavits in reply within the fixed timetable to prevent delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>