<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 805 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order, and concluding that the penalties imposed were not justified based on the evidence presented. The duty demand was found not maintainable, leading to the setting aside of the confiscation order and penalties imposed on the individuals. The appeals were allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 805 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order, and concluding that the penalties imposed were not justified based on the evidence presented. The duty demand was found not maintainable, leading to the setting aside of the confiscation order and penalties imposed on the individuals. The appeals were allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>